Infrastructure
Sewers, bridges and power lines are often taken for granted in countries like Australia and New Zealand. But many developing countries around the world lack even the most basic infrastructure.
‘Around the world more than 1 billion people lack access to roads, 1.2 billion do not have safe drinking water, 2.3 billion have no reliable sources of energy, 2.4 billion lack sanitation facilities and 4 billion are without modern communication services.’ (1)
This situation has consequences that create and perpetuate poverty. Hunger, one of the most obvious symptoms of poverty, is often less the result of a lack of food than a distance from food. When people live far away from food sources, food security depends on infrastructure that ensures food can be transported in an efficient and cost effective way (2).
Lack of infrastructure also leads to lack of employment by acting as a disincentive to investment. Companies who struggle to produce and sell goods in an area with inadequate roads, electricty or water supply do not want to set up the factories or businesses that could potentially generate employment, improve living standards and reduce poverty.

Lack of infrastructure also leads to poor health and high mortality, conditions that exacerbate poverty. Where there are no clinics or hospitals available, or where lack of roads or bridges makes them inaccessible, people cannot access the medical services that they require to be healthy and productive. A villager in Mozambique explains "The most dangerous thing is that [cholera] has always appeared during the rainy season, and it is then that the river is in spate and boats cannot cross." (3) The answer to treating cholera in this case is not medicine or doctors, it's a bridge.
Infrastructure that provides access to water and sanitation facilities are also key to good health. Tube wells or piped water are needed for people to drink, cook and bathe. Sanitary toilet facilities are required to prevent the spread of bacteria and disease.
In addition to health, education is another important factor that enables people to overcome extreme poverty. Where there are no schools - another essential element of basic infrastructure - it becomes difficult to educate children or adults.
Investment in infrastructure development and maintenance is essential to address these as well as other factors that contribute to poverty. However, simply developing infrastructure is not enough. In addition to perpetuating poverty where infrastructure does not exist, poverty can also affect how much access people have to infrastructure where it does exist. This is especially true for women, who make up two thirds of the world's poorest and who have the least access to economic infrastructure as a result of social and cultural norms. Infrastructure must be pro-poor and gender sensitive to ensure that it benefits those who depend on it to escape extreme poverty.

Infrastructure and the MDGs
Each of the eight MDGs depends on some element of infrastructure. From reducing hunger through improved roads on which to transport food or better irrigation systems, to building gender-sensitive infrastructure that benefits women, substantial investments in infrastructure will be required to meet the MDGs and their targets 4.
Challenges
- Affordability: Infrastructure is relatively expensive. For infrastructure to have an impact, funding and resources must be provided for it to be properly constructed and maintained, but high costs lead to underinvestment and poor maintenance. In the Nigerian capital, Lagos, costly infrastructure was neglected to the point that “Over the past 20 years, the city has lost much of its street lighting, its dilapidated road system has become extremely congested, there are no longer regular refuse collections (...). The city’s sewerage network is practically non-existent and at least two-thirds of childhood disease is attributable to inadequate access to safe drinking water.” 5
- Privatisation: Involving private companies can be an effective way to facilitate infrastructure development; private companies are often more efficient and cost effective when it comes to building and maintaining infrastructure. However, privatisation can also be based on financial models that are disadvantageous to the poor, such as 'user pays' schemes. In many cases "infrastructure privatisation has proceeded without adequate consideration being given to the needs of the poor." 6 Jerome suggests, "The goal should be a more efficient sector delivering quality service while fulfilling its social responsibilities. Privatisation is only an effective means towards the achievement of this goal if it is done in the context of an appropriate market and regulatory framework."
- Displacement: Large infrastructure projects require land that may displace individuals or communities living there. In such cases, the governments and agencies involved in the construction of infrastructure must take responsibility for the compensation and resettlement of those communities. Unfortunately, this process is not always adequately managed, particularly when the communities being displaced are the poor, who often don't have legal rights to the land they live on. The most well-known example of infrastructure development leading to displacement is the case of the Three Gorges Hydro-Electric Dam in China. More than 1.2 million people have already had to relocate to make space for the project, and another 4 million may be displaced to ensure environmental safety. 7 While the dam will generate valuable electricity that can foster wider economic growth, it is possible that the people whose lives where uprooted by the dam many not directly benefit from this energy production.

Effective actions
- Investment in public infrastructure benefits economic growth. Public investment in infrastructure added 0.85% per annum to economic growth in China; 0.80% in Indonesia, 1.32% in India; 0.45% in Bangladesh and 0.30% in Pakistan 8 .
- Participatory development enables the construction of pro-poor infrastructure such as small roads, bridges, schools, rural markets and health clinics. Participation also builds management skills, improves the long term sustainability of the project, and increases labor income, agricultural production, non-farm employment opportunities and, importantly, access to food 9. In Senegal, for example, such an approach has increased the sense of ownership – resulting in facilities that are sustainably used and kept in good condition.
- Gender sensitive infrastructure that responds to the barriers to women's access and their differentiated needs for services - such as sanitary facilities in public market places or street lights - benefit women directly and have wider family and community impacts given the role of women as caregivers and community organisers.
- Shared financing by state government, donor agencies and private institutions to avoid overlapping and high cost services that will prevent access for the poor. In Cotonou, Benin, as a result of a mutual cooperation between the local water vendor association and national water company, water provision for the poor has been undisrupted and the quality improved 10.
"Infrastructure is the basis for poverty reduction as well as economic growth."11
Links
AUSAid Aid Theme - Infrastructure
Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: What is the connection?
Infrastructure, Natural Disasters and Poverty
Infrastructure, growth and poverty: some cross country evidence
Rural Infrastructure Programmes for Poverty Reduction: policy issues from the Sri Lankan Experience
Life stories - Living with Poverty - Mozambique - Infrastructure
Types of projects causing displacement
Infrastructure and Poverty - A Gender Analysis
References
FAO. (2008). Assesment of the World Nutrition and Security Situation. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.
Gandy, M (2006). ‘Planning, Antiplanning and the Infrastructure Crisis Facing Metropolitan Lagos’. Urban Studies (43:2): 372-95.
Lewis, B. (2005). ‘Indonesian Local Government Spending,Taxing and Saving: an explanation of pre and post-decentralization fiscal outcomes’, Asian Economic Journal (19:3): 291-317.
Lewis, B. (2006). 'Local government taxation: an analysisof administrative cost inefficiency', Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies (42:2): 213-33.
ODI (2006). Infrastructure challenges in East and Southeast Asia.
OECD (2006). Promoting pro-poor growth: infrastructure.
Serageldin et al (2008). Municipal financing and urban development. UN-Habitat.
UNDP (2005). Making Infrastructure work for the poor. New York: UNDP.
UNDP (2005). Human Development Report 2005: International cooperation at a crossroads: aid, trade and security in an unequal world. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UN-Habitat (2003). The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
World Bank (2007). World Development Report 2008: agriculture for development. Washington: World Bank.
World Bank (2009). World Development Report 2009: reshaping economic geography. Washington: World Ban
Notes
1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2006).
2. http://africanpress.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/infrastructure-is-as-critical-to-food-security-as-tonnage-benin-farmers-and-agriculture-experts-say/
3. http://www.panos.org.uk/?lid=24572
4. http://www.adbi.org/files/2004.12.6.cpp.infrastructure.poverty.reduction.pdf
5. Gandy (2006: 372)
6. Jerome, A. (2004) Infrastructure Privatisation and Poverty Reduction in Africa http://www.tips.org.za/node/799
7. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/oct/13/china.waveandtidalpower
8. ODI, 2006
9. UNDP, 2005: 40
10. Seragaldin, 2008: 105-6
11. http://www.jica.go.jp/laos/english/economic.html