Email this page to a friend!

Touched Up - Images of Poverty

 

This is the first in a new series of blogs, perspectives on poverty, which takes you inside the world of communicating the fight against poverty to the public.

A few months ago, we had a bit of a rant about poverty p**n, the phenomenon of well-meaning westerners using guilt-inducing photos for fundraising. Today, we want to open it up a little more and show just how easy it is to a use a photo out of context to achieve this purpose.

The post is inspired by UNICEF, who despite doing some amazing work on the ground in some of the world’s most challenging places, have a habit of producing poverty p**n. The image you can see here comes from a newspaper website and was snapped a couple of weeks ago.

And, seeing how the photo’s been cropped, we wondered how easy it is to create a similarly desperate looking and guilt-inducing image from any photo.

So, we did a shout around the office for people’s travel photos, and found a photo that resembles one that most people who’ve spent time in developing countries would have – being swamped by local kids.

The intern who gave us the photo explained that the photo is of him “being mobbed on the local football field in the township by local kids who wanted to tackle me to the floor (WWF wrestling is all the rage out there) and play with my camera and sunglasses.”

It’s an innocuous image. It’s fun, it’s bright, it’s hopeful, and it’s representative of life in the townships a lot of the time. But, it’s not really in line with many of the images that the media and some NGOs choose to use to shock us.

So, with the challenge of making the image look like a dodgy fundraising poster, we took 5 minutes on a free, unsophisticated editing program to crop, colour and zoom. Here’s what we came up with. Throw on a caption such as ‘Help them have a better future’, and there go.

It’s not the most guilt-inducing image, but it’s a sample of how easy it is to strip an image of context and use it in ways that the people in the photo, and often even the photographer, never intended.

Beyond editing an actual photo, you can put people in a context that makes them look poor and needy, like Duncan McNicholl in this blog at Water Wellness.

The moral of the story?

People living in poverty aren’t just there for us to use as icons for fundraising. The story of those living in poverty is not the single narrative of need and deprivation that we often see in the media. In the words of Chimamanda Adichie in a recent TEDtalk, there’s danger in the “single story of poverty.”

Posted by Simon Moss - GPP General Manager in Poverty for column Perspectives on Poverty on Oct 1st 2010, 11:00

Comments

02/10/10 12:15am - Posted By Herman Janssen - Reply to this comment
An excample from Romania: A local Gypsy wich we interviewed about the needs of youth, told us about western people who come to make pictures. They hang up a story and make big promises to come back and help them. The photo's endup on the internet for fundraising. But the same people has never been seen again. This should be seen as a crime!
02/10/10 2:17am - Posted By Amy - Reply to this comment
I know how you feel and I know what you are trying to say....

But come on, this is really, really insignificant when it comes to the big picture of aid.
I am a photographer. If I wanted to take sad pictures I could. If I wanted to take fun pictures I could also - and then crop them to be sad. This is the age of photoshop - accept it.
Pictures are pictures and if they convey something that brings money to the table then so be it.

I'd rather a photographer crop a photo to convey a situation from the outskirts of the danger zone, than be killed in the field while working in a dangerous area.
http://www.charityandsecurity.org/background/Aid_Workers_Killed_Abducted_World_2009

Aid workers lives are just as important as those they are trying to help.

02/10/10 2:27am - Posted By Simon Moss - Reply to this comment
Amy - I certainly agree when it comes to safety, but not when it comes to fundraising.

My issue isn't with photographers, it's with editors and fundraisers who deliberately choose or manipulate images to guilt people into giving. I accept that guilt is a tool that people use - but what I don't accept is the way in which it leaves us with constant images of "Africa" as only being desperate, poor and black.

I'll be posting about media headlines, fundraising tactics and other tricks of the trade in the coming weeks. I agree it's not the most important issue in aid, but it's part of a bigger picture of how development is perceived by the public, which is increasingly becoming an issue for political support, fundraising - and ultimately, our ability to see the world's poorest supported with the resources needed to enable them to lift themselves out of poverty.
07/10/10 3:40pm - Posted By Tim - Reply to this comment
Nice post, Simon - couldn't agree with you more.
It's so easy to fall into the 'pity' trap when portraying aid recipients.
I'd stumbled across that Water Wellness post a while ago and thought it was fascinating, not so much what the project was doing, but that it was the minority in an industry that supposedly purports to help people.
There is definitely something to be said against perpetuating the myth of extreme poverty because it fits a marketing brief.
16/10/10 3:45am - Posted By Siddharth Bargate - Reply to this comment
,How You Can Help Poor and Needy With No Cost By Click To Donate Program
A click-to-donate site is a website where users can click a button to generate a donation for a charity or cause. The money for the donation comes from advertisers whose banners are displayed each time a user clicks the button. While not directly contributing (though many sites offer additional ways of support), visitors are making a difference in the sense that, had they not visited, no donation would have been given.

In most cases, the donation generated by each user only amounts to a few cents, but the goal is to accumulate enough clicks to add up to a significant amount.

Many charities launched this style of program in the late 1990s. However, the constriction of online advertising spending around 2001 following the dot-com collapse caused many sites to be closed. Yet there are still many which are in operation.Below is all Click to Donate website where you have to just visit and click and make our world a better place.

[1]. http://www.bhookh.com
[2]. http://www.freerice.com
[3]. http://www.thehungersite.com
[4]. http://www.thebiblesite.org
[5]. http://www.aidtochildren.com
[6]. http://www.freepoverty.com
[7]. http://www.care2.com
[8]. http://www.thenonprofits.com
[9]. http://www.clickatatime.org
[10]. http://www.cleanbreath.org
[11]. http://www.donateyourclick.com
[12]. http://www.clickhelpworld.com
[13]. http://www.oneclickonemeal.com
[14]. http://www.buildaschool.org
[15]. http://www.barillaus.com/Pages/Share-The-Table-Landing.aspx

IF ANY ABOVE LINK NOT WORKING PLEASE COPY AND PASTE INTO WINDOW SEARCH BOX.,
Thanks From Siddharth Bargate
17/10/10 8:04pm - Posted By blankets - Reply to this comment
I enjoying reading your posts, especially in <a href="http://www.budgetblankets.com/">Blankets</a>,.I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles.<a href="http://www.budgetblankets.com/">Custom Blankets</a>, I enjoying reading your post. You make 100% right points in a concise and pertinent fashion, I will read more of your stuff, <a href="http://www.budgetblankets.com/">Fleece Blankets</a>,thank you for your time.Not only are you right, but you have clearly delineated the alternative position.I love these stories! Keep making them!I am definitely bookmarking this page and sharing it with my friends.
10/10/11 1:44am - Posted By Vinny - Reply to this comment
It's much eiaesr to understand when you put it that way!

Add Comment

Your Name:

Your Email (Not Displayed):

Please enter the code in the image into the box

Code:


Can't read the image? Reload