Email this page to a friend!

Closing the Gap on Education For All

 

In the international development sector, we are constantly highlighting the importance of education. We strive to educate the Global North about poverty-related issues, and we push for improvements in schooling in the Global South. Education plays such a vital role in alleviating poverty, but when a community is living in poverty, it is often the first thing to be overlooked.

In unstable living environments, such as in new settlement areas and refugee camps, education can often take a back seat. The health and safety of families takes priority, and rightly so, but this doesn’t mean that education should be ignored.

An article on the BBC website addressed this issue in Zimbabwe. Six years ago, families were evicted from their homes as part of Operation Murambatsvina. Their slums were destroyed and they were resettled in order to give them a better quality of life, but it didn’t quite go to plan.

An Amnesty International report argues that the move has simply created greater problems, with education being one such issue. Children previously had access to education, however, it has not been provided by the government in the new settlements. Unregistered primary schools have been set up in some areas, but a lack of trained teachers and resources is affecting future prospects for the children.

The organisation found that, because they could not go to school, some young women were encouraged to get married earlier in order to be provided for, whilst others entered into the sex industry. These are common consequences throughout the Global South due to limited options for uneducated girls.

Despite the mention of girls, it’s important to recognise that access to education isn’t about gender in this case. Both boys and girls are being denied an education because of the area they’re living in, giving them fewer opportunities for the future.

Education offers children a chance to a life free from poverty, as discussed in the context of a refugee camp in a recent article. After genocide and violence in Sudan, there are over 250,000 Darfuri refugees in Chad living in unstable conditions. In a situation such as this, it is easy to forget about educating the children. However, schools and learning centres have been set up in camps, providing hope for the community. It means that when the children return home or become settled in another area, they will not have suffered academically.

The camps in Chad are an example of how NGOs and other actors in development can create positivity in unstable living environments. Access to high quality education can improve quality of life, and ensure that children have greater opportunities in the long term. Among all the challenges they face in unstable living environments, education can create a crucial path towards establishing stability.

To learn more about how you can help to ensure universal access to education, check out the actions of RESULTS.

Posted by Hannah Jones in Education for column Issue Analysis on Jan 5th, 14:15

African Coalition Against Malaria

 

Malaria. Maybe we know it as ‘a disease commonly found in Africa’, ‘a disease that’s caused by mosquito bites’, or perhaps even ‘a disease that Cheryl Cole had’. But the most important aspect to focus on is that it’s a disease that can be prevented. If key actors in development can work together effectively and efficiently, we can reduce the number of people dying of malaria. And we are.

An article in the Poverty Matters Blog discussed the involvement of African Leaders in the fight against malaria. The African Leaders Malaria Alliance (Alma) is a coalition of African heads of state striving towards reducing the number of deaths caused by malaria. They have recently created a scorecard for accountability and action to keep track of progress made, and their aim is to bring malaria deaths in Africa to near zero by 2015.

 

The scorecard – supported by the World Health Organisation (WHO) – is a useful way of presenting the data, and four colours are used to measure progress made. It’s clear to see where work is still needed. However, a number of targets have been achieved, and it’s important to recognise these achievements.

 

“As heads of state and government, we are ultimately responsible for demonstrating that aid is being used wisely, effectively and efficiently.”

 

It would be naive to think that a colour-coded scorecard is going to eliminate malaria in Africa, particularly when it clearly shows that there is still much more to do. However, it’s more than just a scorecard. It represents a realisation made by African leaders that they have a vital role to play. And this is definitely a step in the right direction.

We need to remember that it’s in the interest of African leaders to eliminate malaria. This is because the disease is closely linked to poverty, both as a cause and a consequence. It creates problems at an individual, household, community and national level. If we can reduce malaria occurrences, we can create positive changes: less strain on hospital resources so that more people can be treated for other illnesses; children can go to school instead of looking after their ill parents; parents can earn an income, and money can be spent on improving nutrition and sending their children to school. This can perhaps be seen as simplified and idealistic, but it’s possible, and it’s happening now.

Malaria is the cause of over three quarters of a million deaths per year, but 11 countries have reduced deaths caused by malaria by more than 50% since 2000. This is evidence that, with government involvement and the continued support from NGOs, progress is being made.

Malaria No More UK is one such charity aiming to reduce deaths caused by malaria. How? By investing in prevention, diagnosis and treatment, including bed nets, spraying, diagnostic tests and medicines, and a vaccination.

If malaria is a preventable disease and we know how to prevent it, then why is it still such a problem? As with everything poverty-related, there are complex issues involved. It’s important to recognise these complexities; if eliminating malaria was as simple as providing bed nets we would have done it already. But the commitment from the governments is a positive step forward in the battle to end malaria. So, can we reach the target of bringing malaria deaths in Africa to near zero by 2015? Well, we can certainly try.

Posted by Hannah Jones in Poverty, Aid, Global Health for column Issue Analysis on Oct 26th 2011, 10:29