Email this page to a friend!

Digital Activism in Action

 

In my previous blog about online activism I looked at the potential of digital tools to bring about change offline. In this blog I want to look at digital activism in action to fight for justice in some of the world’s poorest countries.

In February 2009, a campaign was created to protest against members of a group who were sponsoring attacks on women drinking in pubs. The Pink Chaddi Campaign invited to send pink underwear (Chaddi in Hindi) to the head of the right-wing Hindu group Sri Ram Sena as symbol of a non-violent protest. More than 2,000 pairs were sent.

Whilst this may seem like a comical example, it shows the power of online activism - Facebook played a fundamental role in the campaign, helping it to go viral. The Pink Chaddi group mobilised 16,000 people to join the campaign within just three days, and had more than 50,000 members within a few months. As the blogger Guarav Mishra said it was “one of the best Indian examples of how grassroots community can come together, collaborate and take collective action using social media tools”.

The campaign succeeded in creating a space of debate between ordinary people and the Hindu right. It also catalysed the attention of mainstream media all around the world raising awareness of the problem far beyond the confines of the particular society.

Unfortunately, the campaign also highlighted the perils of online campaigning. In April 2009, the Facebook group was hacked, resulting in it being disabled. This is probably not surprising, we all are very aware of the risks the Internet can present. However, it also proves the power of the campaign. If it had not been so successful in catalysing civil society’s attention and raising awareness, it would have not been considered a threat worthy of attacking. It was able to create a powerful voice and make people reflect on the issue, scaring those who would prefer to silence the debate.

In 2004, Fahamu and Solidarity for African Women’s Right (SOAWR) ran a campaign in support of the Africa Women’s Rights Protocol. The Protocol’s aim was to provide a comprehensive framework for the promotion and protection of women’s human rights but needed to be approved by 15 countries in the African Union to come into force. The main tool used was a web-based petition gathering signatures in support of the protocol.

Fahamu was also able to add an SMS function to the petition, meaning that people could add their name via SMS. This was a remarkable innovation considering that Africa has much more mobile users than email users. The petition collected 4,000 signatures, of which 500 were received via text messages. Although this number may seem small, given the difficulties accessing the Internet in many African countries, it is nonetheless significant. Within 15 months, the required 15 countries finally ratified the protocol bringing it into force.

A final project I wanted to look at started in India in August 2010. I Paid a Bribe is an initiative launched by Janaagraha to fight corruption in Indian society. The project uses a website as platform for analysing and reporting corruption. Through the website people can report corrupt acts that will be aggregated and analysed in order to expose the most serious areas of corruption in the society. After assessing the cases reported, Janaagraha approaches the government for action.

Through the “Ask Raghu” section, the website also provides users with useful information on how they can address and resist corruption. According to Raghunandan, the creator of the project and a former senior civil servant, the website gets about 25 to 50 reports each day in the ‘I paid a bribe’, ‘I didn’t pay a bribe’ and ‘I didn’t have to pay a bribe’ sections and has about 20 questions asked on the “Ask Raghu” column every day.

Since the project was started very recently, it is still difficult to assess its impact on the Indian civil society. However, the frequency and volume of the reports and questions clearly demonstrates the need for a system to address these issues and the usefulness of this platform to the public.

The above projects are just a few examples of the numerous initiatives and actions that are taken online everywhere in the world. The impact of these campaigns has as wide a range as the digital tools that can be used. The combining factor is the will to improve civil societies and fight situations of injustice.

It is important to acknowledge these efforts and recognise their place in modern society. It may be that the revolution will not ‘take place’ online, but, as can be seen from the numerous example around the web, it is increasingly likely that it will start online.

Posted by Elisa Marcon - GPP Intern in Technology for column Action Stories on Dec 6th 2010, 08:33

Does social media have a place in development?

 

Here at the Global Poverty Project we firmly believe in the power of communication. However, in the wake of the heated debate around online activism, we found ourselves asking the question: will online activism help to end poverty or is it just “clicktivism” as Malcolm Gladwell argued in the New Yorker? The answer to this question is not an easy one.

The criticisms of online activism are broadly based on two objections: the inability of online movements to have any real effects off-line, and the incapacity of the internet to foster connections and collective identities.

It’s clear to us that the first of these is simply incorrect.

The Haiti debt cancellation campaign is an excellent example. In the aftermath of the earthquake that hit Haiti on 12th January 2010, the country owed 891 million dollars mainly to the IMF (International Monetary Fund). In addition, the IMF pledged more money to help Haiti, but this money was offered in the form of loans. In this way more debt would have been added on the country. In the same month, a worldwide coalition of organisations including ONE, Jubilee Debt Campaign and Oxfam launched a campaign to cancel Haiti’s debt by urging their supporters to take action and sign a petition on line. The petition reached more than 400,000 signatures in just a few weeks and was handed in at the G7 Finance Ministers summit on 6th February. These Finance Ministers agreed to push for the cancellation of Haiti’s multilateral debts and after few months, on July 21st, the IMF finally agreed to cancel the Haitian debt.

I would argue that the second objection is also incorrect. Arguing that the Internet does not foster a real connection among people, underestimates the potential of new media. Social networks like Facebook and Twitter give people the ability to overcome national and international boundaries. An American can easily campaign alongside an Indian to see an end to extreme poverty within a generation despite their lack of physical proximity. This feeling of solidarity and the powers of aggregation and organisation created by the new media can help activists to tackle global issues on a global scale by calling to action networks of people all around the world.

It’s important to acknowledge that in the last decades an important change has occurred, that is the creation of new media that have made possible a two-way communication. These new media have not substituted traditional one-way communications but supplemented it, adding a new dimension of interaction into the creation of messages. It has also empowered people, giving them the ability to create new movements using their own initiatives, and communicate it without the need for a central source.

The Global Poverty Project is a movement of people that believe they can fight together to bring an end to extreme poverty. Social media such as Twitter and Facebook have changed the face of communications and have given us an invaluable opportunity to create a dynamic debate about what we are doing and what we can do to achieve this. Through social media people can tell us what they’re doing, suggest which topics they would like us to discuss and create an interaction with thousands of people from all around the world that in the past would have been impossible to build.

Combined with effective education campaigns and offline activism, these new online tools cannot but be considered an important resource. This is why we ask you to join the conversation and follow us both via Facebook and Twitter. Ask your questions, tell us what you think and help us build a movement that will bring an end to poverty within a generation. Make the most out of it, this can be your first step towards change.

Posted by Elisa Marcon - GPP Intern in Technology for column Issue Analysis on Nov 10th 2010, 08:06