Email this page to a friend!

MDG 8: M-Pesa mobile banking

 

I‘ve always taken my bank for granted. Sure, they annoy me from time to time, but it’s only because I expect to be able to get to the little money I have 24 hours a day, 365 days a week without having to carry it around with me all the time.

But, according to UN figures, having a bank account is rare across Africa, as 80% of the population remains unbanked and in Kenya this figure hits a staggering 90%. This means that most people in Africa have nowhere to deposit their vital savings and are left to keep their assets in the form of cows and chickens that are prone to sickness or accidents. They’re left unable to ever get a loan or credit in times of need or to invest in property or their business.

It’s for this reason that we need to see access to banks and savings as a part of the fight against poverty.

As can be seen from the video above M-Pesa from Safaricom has provided an innovative solution. The system is simple: the user visits an M-Pesa agent and deposits cash; they receive an e-float on their mobile which can then be transferred to another user’s mobile; the user at the other end can visit their local agent and withdraw the cash. The system also works by providing a rudimentary savings account for the users, as money can be stored in their M-Pesa account.

For many people in developing countries their mobile is their lifeline to information, and so has become a vital trusted asset to them, so the power of integrating this system on a wider scale is immense as it will give people a way to manage their money without having to make lengthy and often costly trips to find a bank.

The benefit this will provide to the sphere of microfinance is a good example of how this technology can help end extreme poverty. Users can receive the loan into their M-Pesa account and visit the local agent to withdraw the money. Then, rather than having to stop working in order to make trips to the bank to repay the loan this can be done via few button presses on their mobile phone, and they can continue their work, increasing their amount of time to earn money.

Clearly this technology is a great tool towards the achievement of MDG 8 and the end of extreme poverty overall, and its wider adoption across the developing world is something to be encouraged.

Posted by Guy Kirkpatrick - GPP Intern in Technology for column Millennium Development Goals on Sep 20th 2010, 06:00

Comments

08/10/10 12:06am - Posted By mohammed husain - Reply to this comment
has the united states done all they can so far to try complete the mdg #1?
10/08/11 5:58am - Posted By Latoya - Reply to this comment
Heckvua good job. I sure appreciate it.
23/07/12 1:07am - Posted By Leah - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Dear Professor Picciotto / Bob:I agree that the MDG perspective of devmeoplent is broader than the growth-oriented economic model that in some respected preceded it, and in some respects is co-existing with it. But that does not answer the different point I made, that is also made in International Alert's report, that is also made by a range of different commentators, and that is also implicitly conceded by the latest draft final outcome document of the UN Summit: this point is simply that the MDGs are narrow compared to what is needed for devmeoplent.It follows in logic and in fact that pursuit of the MDGs is misleading as a way of pursuing devmeoplent. To emphasise the point again, the goals in themselves are uncontestable and the first big problems arise not because of the goals but because of the way they have been treated as if they are comprehensive. Unless you are prepared to argue that peace, good governance, security etc are not necessary for devmeoplent, I cannot see a way in which this critique is not valid.As to confusion of means and ends, the MDGs do indeed or, more precisely, are indeed treated so that they include targets and indicators. Each goal is expressed with a set of targets and with the targets go the indicators. So they are used as measures and anecdotal evidence makes clear that there are cases of them being used as guides for policy. Sorry to say, but it is a classic case of confusing ends and means.The legitimacy argument is a strong one and I grant and International Alert's new report also grants that the case can be made. But as a different comment on this blog post points out, the legitimacy of some governments is not as strong as the legitimacy of some others. Repeated approval by a succession of UN conferences can carry more than one meaning.We can certainly agree that the rules of the international financial, trade and economic game could do with being revisited in a quite far-reaching way no dispute from me on that and perhaps they deserve that attention more than the MDGs do. But, firstly, that suggests that the economic environment is more determinative of economic devmeoplent than devmeoplent aid, which I don't take to be your argument. While, secondly, the difficult thing to figure out is how it is possible for countries to develop despite unfair trading relations and general global inequity. The International Alert proposes that it is possible to do that while working within the current international economic world system, but only by paying attention to politics and to conflict issues, both of which were excluded from the MDGs.It is indubitably a great big ask to seek a shared understanding of human progress. And certainly there is nothing in International Alert's report or my blog post to justify the criticism that it is proposing or seeking a blueprint. To a different charge putting forward an overall vision to see what takers there are and to stimulate debate to that I think we happily plead guilty.And by the way, on human devmeoplent, if you look again at what the report takes out of the Douglass North work on violence and social orders and compare that with the work of Amartya Sen and of the HDP going back to the early 1990s, you will find a lot of common ground, and a common basis of critique not only of the growth-oriented devmeoplent model of old but also of the selective focus of the MDGs.Sorry we disagree on this. On some issues the disagreements are quite small but on some also quite significant. I think this is a discussion that must and will keep developing.Dan
24/07/12 3:52am - Posted By grcsdkcgkaa - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
YRgt1U , [url=http://uevjynciijwb.com/]uevjynciijwb[/url], [link=http://ibvitdtcrhay.com/]ibvitdtcrhay[/link], http://epoxmljcrvzb.com/
24/07/12 5:48pm - Posted By fvwheoyvehp - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
bA4DDG <a href="http://xzsbkwpatsuq.com/">xzsbkwpatsuq</a>
25/07/12 6:09am - Posted By hpkykta - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
6bi1ev , [url=http://swwujkwlrkwo.com/]swwujkwlrkwo[/url], [link=http://efrewlbfuqog.com/]efrewlbfuqog[/link], http://hcwdnkdihztl.com/

Add Comment

Your Name:

Your Email (Not Displayed):

Please enter the code in the image into the box

Code:


Can't read the image? Reload