Email this page to a friend!

A Picture's worth a thousand words

 

Have you ever seen one of those photos where there’s a starving child with distended belly, looking forlornly up at a camera, asking you to save them?

On the TV news, in magazines, and occasionally on advertising for charities. Playing on our fears and sympathy, they try to push a giant button on our forehead labeled “GUILT.”

These images make me angry. They make me angry because that’s just not what extreme poverty is really about. Yes, it’s real – people really do live in such challenging circumstances, but when it’s the only image we see, it sends all the wrong messages.

It’s poverty porn – gratuitous and explicit images that strip away people’s identity and personality, making them out to be little more than meat.

It makes out that people in extreme poverty aren’t willing or able to do things for themselves. It makes out that people in extreme poverty are victims, that they need us to save them. And, without really even thinking about it, it reinforces the idea that people in extreme poverty are somehow less than us – less valuable, less capable, less intelligent … and less human.

I had a chance to reflect on this recently when I caught up with Ann Cotton, founder and Director of girls’ education charity CAMFED. We were chatting about some of the amazing people we’d met who lived in extreme poverty, and how they were nothing like the photos we sometimes saw.

The people we’d met and the lives we’d have the privilege to share in, if only briefly, weren’t victims at all. They may have been hungry, some may have been sick, but these weren’t their defining features. They were mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters, sons and daughters. They were working hard in their community to create a better life for themselves and their families. They were worried about the same things that I was worried about – being able to pay the bills, making up with a loved one they’d recently had a fight with, and hoping that their football team would win on the weekend.

As Ann and I chatted, we agreed that the sorts of images that we should be seeing of people in extreme poverty are images of everyday life, that respect people and show them as they’d like to be shown. Positive images – the sort that we use on this website, in our films and in our presentations.

So, next time you’re thinking about using some images of poverty – for awareness raising, for a report, for a fundraiser – ask yourself if you’re picking the right images. Ask yourself if you’d be happy for someone in Asia or Africa to show the photo if you were in it – or if you’d like to be more methodical, you can use the sort of criteria that we use in deciding what images to show:

 • Permission – Do I (or the photographer) have the person’s informed and explicit permission to show their image?

• Do No Harm - Am I creating and using material in a manner that will do no harm to those involved?

• Do Good - What is my intention or purpose for creating this material?

• Fidelity - Am I using content in a way that fairly represents the real situation?

• Justice - Am I portraying people and communities with the same respect I would show to neighbors and strangers

  in my home country?

 

Comments

25/03/10 5:07pm - Posted By Nick - Reply to this comment
Great post Simon, couldn't agree more.
Development NGOs need to get much better at portraying positive images.
For a great discussion of this check out this great article by Nicholas Kristoff: http://outside.away.com/outside/culture/200912/nicholas-kristof-philanthropy-advice-1.html
25/03/10 7:09pm - Posted By Tam - Reply to this comment
Those images always made me angry, too, but I couldn't put my finger on exactly why until now. Thanks for your insightful post. I hope the GPP can follow your ideas. I'd love to see more poverty campaigns that aren't about Guilt. I think they would work well in this current "economic climate".

More "Wouldn't you love to be involved with these wonderful, hardworking people?"
Less "If you don't give us your money, you should feel terrible".
25/03/10 7:12pm - Posted By Samantha - Reply to this comment
Whilst I agree that it's important to constantly ask ourselves what these images are doing, I think that the idea that they do nothing but hit the guilt button reflects a masculine view of how moral thinking works. When I see these children I don't feel guilt, rather, I feel a strong desire to reach out and hold them in my arms and do whatever I can to help them. That is, it presses my love button, not my guilt button. Men often assume that being ethical is all about curbing our selfishness with feelings of guilt and shame. From a more feminine perspective, (and I hesitate to make broad sex-based generalisations but there is enough psychological data now to support at least a statistical tendency in this direction) it is often more about being able to extend our natural feelings of sociability through positive, rather than negative emotion. The difficulty, is that we have to feel that we can do something, and the need is so widespread that it can overwhelm us. So the problem with this imagery is that it sometimes is dis-empowering to the carer as well as the cared-for because the magnitude of suffering is so great that we have to switch off out of despair. This raises an entirely different set of questions to the ones you have asked.
26/03/10 1:47am - Posted By Rose - Reply to this comment
I just hope there are more people who would believe in what Simon Moss said. It moved me. I just hope it moves millions more... not just a bunch...
26/03/10 4:22am - Posted By Simon moss - Reply to this comment
Apologies to anyone who posted a comment and saw it disappear.

We've just discovered a problem where google trawlers automatically flag comments and inappropriate - and so they get taken down until we manually unflagging them. Our tech guys are working on fixing this, and in the meantime we will manually monitor for comments every hour or so to make sure things aren't disappearing.

We welcome your comments, compliments and criticisms - and would only delete comments that are defamatory or promote illegal activity.
26/03/10 4:32am - Posted By Simon moss - Reply to this comment
Samantha - I think u r spot on in saying it's about empowerment and agency.

My dislike for these photos is driven by portraying people as victims.

I think that the emotions you are speaking of - love, empathy, nurturing and care - are exactly the ones we want to be driving - but not at the expense of removing agency, identity and personality fromthe person we're responding to.

I'm angry that all too often, we only see images that equate poverty with Africa, afrca with starving children, and starving children to a response of giving money. This is part of the picture, but only a very small part.
26/03/10 5:10pm - Posted By Belinda Collins - Reply to this comment
Thanks for recognising the basic human rights of our brothers and sisters in extreme poverty Simon - a great reminder
15/05/10 2:52am - Posted By Simon Moss - Reply to this comment
Relevant follow up blog from a Canadian volunteer in Malawi - http://waterwellness.ca/2010/04/28/perspectives-of-poverty/

Here's part of what is in the blog (there are great photos too):
I thought that these images were robbing people of their dignity, and I felt that the rest of the story should be told as well. Out of this came the idea for a photography project, which I am tentatively calling “Perspectives of Poverty”. I am taking two photos of the same person; one photo with the typical symbols of poverty (dejected look, ripped clothes, etc.), and another of this person looking their very finest, to show how an image can be carefully constructed to present the same person in very different ways. I want to bring to light some of the different assumptions we make about a person, especially when we see an image of “poverty” from rural Africa. So far, I have finished two sets in the series and I want to share them with you to get reactions and hopefully generate some discussion around this in the early stages of this project.
26/11/10 8:51pm - Posted By Marc Davies - Reply to this comment
Two other things strike me when I'm taking pictures in a resource poor (but not extreme) community (- that there are many who do not want their picture taken, probably because of their sense of dignity or anger regarding their situation, and toward 'voyeurs'. I don't know the answer because I never ask (that's my failing). If I'm honest, I take the picture anyway, without them knowing, because I want to report on it from an unobserved perspective. For me this often portrays a more accurate view anyway, than if the recipient is asked to be involved. Some disagree with this.
Secondly, there are many despite their circumstances, who just want their 'portrait' taken, and the images are often left unused because they don't convey our intended message.
I'd like to see more people from their own community given the camera and the freedom to tell their own story, not ours. If we have a duty, surely a prime one is to give them access to the world in which we live, tell their own story, and for the value of it to be shared back with them.

Add Comment

Your Name:

Your Email (Not Displayed):

Please enter the code in the image into the box

Code:


Can't read the image? Reload